The Close of a Year of Collapse and CrossOver

CrossOver reflection for Week 52 • Beginning December 1, 2019
We Make the Road by Walking, Chapter 13 

Bishop Elaine JW Stanovsky

Long ago and far away, my walk with Jesus took me to Russia, just as the Soviet Union broke up in the early 1990s. Russia was crossing over in 1992 from the secularism, suppression and social control of the Soviet Union. Churches, whose property had been seized and had operated largely underground for 75 years – Orthodox, Catholic, Baptist, Lutheran, Methodist – were all emerging, from the long winter of repression and confinement.    

  • Imagine crossing through security at a prison furniture factory in St. Petersburg, Russia. Your guide is a Russian Orthodox priest, in long black robes, newly recognized as chaplain to the prison. He has convinced prison administrators to allow Christian prisoners to produce small icons of the faith instead of furniture to sell to fund the prison. In a small upper room, it is like a tiny workshop of believers. Those believer prisoners lead you to a far corner of the prison to show you the chapel with a shiny copper onion dome they are building in their free time.  
  • Sit with the Admiral of the Russian Fleet, in the ornate Russian Admiralty, as a U.S. Navy Chaplain tells how he gives spiritual care to sailors and they discuss what military chaplaincy might look like in a post-Soviet Russia.
  • Now walk to a sagging two-story brick building, held upright only with the help of salvaged railroad rails driven crudely through exterior walls to provide cross bracing. Older women love and tend shunned teenaged girls, who are learning to love and tend their babies. They sew dolls that they sell to support their children in an honorable way.  
  • Visit the women’s ward of a stone-cold, drafty 150-year old prison hospital, where a post-operative woman climbs a rattly ladder unaided to her upper bunk every time she has her bandages changed or uses the bathroom.  
  • Notice as one of your traveling companions, a substance abuse counselor, sneaks away from our church hosts to meet surreptitiously with underground advocates for treatment of alcohol and drug dependency in a country that brands alcoholics criminal.

It took the collapse of the Soviet Union for churches in Russia to have the freedom to step outside the tight restrictions on freedom of religion to re-engage in the fabric of community life and to bring the life-giving good news of Jesus Christ to people and a nation who had sat so long in darkness. In 1992 the Christian faith felt fresh and robust, shiny and new. Everything seemed possible. It was a CrossOver season, with plenty of uncertainty, but an irresistible tug toward living faith with every breath, every word, every human encounter.

From Russia with Love

Could we learn from the Churches in Russia? What if The United Methodist Church woke up to discover that our buildings were gone, our websites and Facebook pages shut down, and bank accounts were closed? What would be left of the Church? What difference would it make to the woman in her bunk? A hopeless sailor in the Navy? An alcoholic trapped in his addiction? What would the church be, without all of its institutional forms, habits, schedules?

What if we viewed this season of breakdown or break-up in The United Methodist Church as offering a rare opportunity to think anew and afresh about what the church is for, and how it can best share the blessings of God with the world?  

Crossing Over as a Way of Life

Thank you, for reading, praying, discussing, pondering, imagining new ways to be lovers of God, neighbor, and self.

A year ago I invited you to join me on a year-long CrossOver journey to become “Alive in the adventure of Jesus.” In small groups or alone, for the whole year, or just for a season, many of you read wondered with Brian McLaren in his book, We Make the Road by Walking. A remarkable number of you wrote brilliant, touching, wise blog posts for each chapter of the book. We asked ourselves, how do we understand the Bible? What was Jesus up to? What does it mean for the Church to be Christ’s living presence on earth? How must I live to serve?

Here we are a year later – at the end of our book – realizing that we have not reached the other side. Yet, we are not stalled. We are making the road by walking and we are stronger and bolder as we continue the adventure of Jesus. What I know more clearly now than I did a year ago is that most United Methodists in the Greater Northwest are firmly committed to the full inclusion of LGBTQ+ people in the life of the Church, but that a significant minority understands the Bible to prohibit full inclusion. 

So, what’s next? Though we may not all think alike, may we not love alike?  

I don’t know today if The United Methodist Church will stay together as a world-wide connection, if it will split into two or three separate incompatible entities, or if some “amicable separation” will be negotiated between parties that do not choose to live together anymore. What I think I do know is that God is using this time of uncertainty to invite us to deeper connections with each other. And that deepening our connections with each other will make it easier to walk the way that will unfold before us without hurting each other. 

I am working with a team of leaders from across the Greater Northwest to offer a season of deeper, broader, authentic relationships across the divisions among us from January through May of 2020. John Wesley saw the church as a great life-giving connectionFor Wesley, connection was personal, relational. I’m calling for growing a new, personal, gracious Grassroots Connections among church participants, between our churches, and between people inside and outside our churches. This is where Jesus shows up — when we are in relationship. Watch for more.

With a thankful heart,

Bishop Elaine JW Stanovsky | Greater NW Area

Comments (6)

  • Brian D. McLaren’s book has been a strong influence for the past year. I’m a member of a small church in Idaho, and currently serve in my capacity as Certified Lay Servant, in additional small churches in the NEO Circuit/Colloquy. We are all part of the Sage District. Over the past months, wherever I go, I hear that the smaller churches do not feel included, much as the LGBTQ community has felt for a very long time.

    It is ironic that both groups feel unheard and unconsidered. It is changing slowly, as most things usually do. While I have great empathy for both of these groups, it grieves me that they are not finding a way to support one another. We are Advent people, and we wait. But if we wait while we continue to bicker and behave in destructive ways (or extremely passive ways) to one another, we will both be defeated.

    In this unique season of waiting, let us find quiet determination, to wait together in hope, faith, trusting in God to know what we cannot. Each side has focused inward, and reacted to the “other” in hurtful ways. Let us be always reminded that Jesus stays on the side of the disenfranchised, the marginal, the least-expected.

    To align with a one-issue policy (or heavily weighted issue) is to further exclusion and disservice, to the very ones we have been called to include and serve. Put aside all selfishness and impatience. Embrace the beauty of waiting, and find ways to bring grace, peace, joy and hope to every other soul we may meet.

    Thank you, especially to Bishop Eliane and Ralph Lawrence.

  • There will be no staying together as the UMC. The UMC, at present is merely the name of an organization and not the name of a unified assembly of Christ’s Church.

    My prayer and my congregation’s prayer is that those being lead by ordained ministers and consecrated bishops who have forsaken their sacred commitment to uphold the Doctrine and Discipline of the UMC, will return to Gods clearly understandable Word. The 2016 Book of Discipline is still in complete effect.

    We also pray that those rogue individuals will honor the offices they took an oath to uphold, by resigning the positions they no longer honor and leave our UMC to start their own Post Modern Progressive organization.

    God’s Word is certainly infallible!

  • Bishop Elaine, I resonate with your statement, “I don’t know today if The United Methodist Church will stay together as a world-wide connection, if it will split into two or three separate incompatible entities, or if some ‘amicable separation’ will be negotiated between parties that do not choose to live together anymore.” Thank you for sharing it.

    It seems to me that something might be learned from the World Methodist Conference, that meets every five years at various venues world-wide. I have attended three of those conferences, in Nairobi, Singapore, and Rio de Janeiro, though not recently. I have the impression that many people in our UMC are not aware of the WMC, which, as you know is comprised of some 40-50 Wesleyan bodies, and work together more as a fellowship than as an administratively connected body. There are, in addition to the UMC, representatives of various Wesleyan bodies such as Free Methodist, Wesleyan Church, Church of the Nazarene, Salvation Army, and others, plus various nationally based churches such as the Methodist Church of Kenya, the British Methodist Church, Uniting Church of Australia, the Methodist churches of Russia, Germany, and more. The groups may not agree with each other on every issue, but they have found a way to work in harmony in what they have in common.

    If we should, in fact, divide into “separate incompatible” bodies, I am wondering if another element needs to be added to the mix: Remove the idea of being incompatible, and reorganize around those things which we can honor, even though we are separate.

    It seems to me (retired, with 66 years serving the UMC) that we are larger than assuming we will be separate and incompatible. Why not separate and cooperative? Can we find a way to move forward without allowing a single big issue (in our case, the ministry of the LGBTQ community) to be the only defining factor? It is my hope, wish, prayerful hope, that we might define ourselves in such a way that no one is excluded, including the LGBTQ community, and the many people of our churches who are of more conservative views. I believe this can be done when we approach the entire situation with faith, hope, and love.

    If we, as UMs, define our church as a one-issue church, we will continue to lose membership, and soon we’ll not have much of a denomination. I would like to hear proposals from creative people that would keep as many people within the fellowship as possible. We have always prided ourselves as a diverse church, able to accommodate those with widely ranging views from conservative to liberal, with a significant number of people known as centrist. The current controversy seems to threaten this great tradition.

  • Dramatic. Attention-getting. Stark. Effective.
    Thank you, Bishop Elaine, for this writing and for your consistent leadership and compassion.
    May you have a blessed weekend off-duty, celebrating Thanksgiving.

Leave a Reply

© Copyright 2019, Greater Northwest Episcopal Area. All Rights Reserved.
%d bloggers like this: